Showing posts with label medical billing. Show all posts
Showing posts with label medical billing. Show all posts

Challenges Push Family Practitioners to Partner with Billing Specialists to Improve Revenue

1 comments
Despite the delay in implementation of 26.5 percent cut in Medicare family practitioners payment, AAFP continues to call on Congress for a repeal of the sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula. This is understandable because the deferment means a temporal relief for family practitioners and if SGR is around, given that it assesses growth solely from a financial standpoint, payment cuts introduced without taking medical and human factors into account will continue to recur.

Though, this cut which is framing the political discourse around primary healthcare in the US is a recent phenomenon (the cut was scheduled for implementation on 1st January, 2013), if we go about a year back and take the case of Dr. Hammond, we will see financial problems have been ailing family physicians for some time now.

Dr. Hammond is an independent family physician with a clinic in Denver who ramped up his in-house IT operations and staff to make his practice and services more holistic, such that with his increased staff strength and upgraded IT his practice is able to cover the entire need of a modern-day healthcare operations starting from keeping in touch with patients to track their health and progress to maintaining electronic data. It’s the most ideal practice to have, isn’t it?

See for more information visit : http://www.medicalbillersandcoders.com/

Though, Dr. Hammond and many family practitioners across the US have upgraded their family physician practices to meet the modern needs of healthcare (like outreach and coordination), the fact remains that these enhancements are not reimbursed under traditional insurance contracts making profitability difficult. This together with new payment reforms which encourage healthcare providers to come together is making independent family practitioners a dying breed in the US. Whether this is good or bad for US healthcare is debatable, but a close look at Dr. Hammond’s operations would reveal that it includes lot of things that are not part of core physician practice (like IT data maintenance) and could be kept out to keep the operations thin, nimble and cost-effective.

And as family practitioners wake up to the prospect of frequent cuts in Medicare family physician payments, there problems seem to be getting enough and counting. However, to upgrade their operations, thwart the effects of Medicare cuts and also to gear up for the innovative payment model, many family practices have been joining Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) or setting them up.

But transitioning to ACOs from their traditional mode of practice may not be easy as it involves negotiating pay schedules, negotiating payer contracts etc. Also, it requires monitoring and analyzing information, like eligibility for Medicare, medical outcomes, Medicaid and private insurance, and clinical compliance and reimbursement requirements to name a few. Family practitioners in addition to the Medicare cut challenges will have to ensure ICD-10, HIPAA 5010 compliant billing and coding along with EHR and PQRS.

Medicalbillerandcoders.com, the largest consortium of billers and coders across US, has also been helping various healthcare providers with billing and coding services for over a decade now. MBC’s Revenue Management Consulting services can help family practitioners by assessing their in-house revenue management cycle and ensure sound coordination between various components of healthcare, facilitating smooth flow of medical data for ACO operations and otherwise.

We also identify gaps in your process blocking areas of revenue leakage and identifying areas of staff training.  Additionally, we can help train your staff to  replace applications where required and handle new billing and coding challenges like EHR, PQRS, and ICD-10, and HIPAA 5010 compliance so that they can make error-free insurance claims.

Overcoming Cardiology Billing Concerns in 2013 with Complete Revenue Cycle Management

0 comments

As a specialized healthcare field, Cardiology has cherished generous government support for testing services and unhindered reimbursements. However, with new developments in Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA) and lower reimbursements given recent healthcare reforms, Cardiology billing is expected to face some serious issues in 2013. In addition, ICD -10 and HIPAA regulations are bound to complicate the financial scenario for Cardiologists. Some of the major concerns in Cardiology Billing are expected to be –
  • New Regulations & healthcare reforms – PPACA, ACA, HIPAA and ICD – 10 are some of the most popular regulations and reforms that have shaken the healthcare industry. Cardiologists are facing disconcerting billing issues, patient data documentation issues and coverage related dilemmas
  • Reduced Reimbursements – Due to ever-increasing complexity of claim procedures for insurance providers and reduction in reimbursements from Medicare and Medicaid by up-to 25%, financial performance of every Cardiology Practice is bound to take a hit
  • Consolidation and ACA – With increasing consolidation of large hospitals and independent practitioners, surgeons and physicians are losing their autonomy. Many organizations and practices are participating in Accountable Care projects to reduce costs but are in turn exposing themselves to heightened risks as well
  • Increased no. of patients – With 30 million more patients expected to be covered by the end of the year 2013 as per new government healthcare reforms, burden on care providers is expected to increase multifold
  • Stress on Quality of care – Increasing shift towards quality of care is adding to the service expectations from Cardiologists. Coverage is denied and audit issues arise in case of re-admittance of patients that had cardiac procedures administered on them within a 30 day time period
Despite prospects of difficult times ahead, Cardiology Billing concerns can be effectively addressed with efficient Revenue Cycle Management (RCM). RCM is gaining popularity with healthcare service providers due to the unparalleled time and freedom it offers practitioners to focus on patients. Judiciously aligned RCM can enhance productivity of billing process and reduce financial concerns dramatically-
  • Accurate RCM reduces the claim denial rate by arranging pre-authorizations and checking patient coverage with insurer at the time of registration itself
  • RCM monitors claim filing and coding process for immaculate documentation and patient record maintenance, that supports efficient billing
  • Effective RCM improves revenue capturing and collection of outstanding bills by applying effective denial management, capturing proper documents, handling claim entry and secondary billing
  • RCM also analyzes and realigns the payer mix, ensuring improved payouts per revenue cycle by cutting down the risk of practice
Expecting a Cardiologist to handle all this while delivering quality care service is like hoping for a daily miracle. Medicalbillersandcoders.com is therefore nothing short of a miracle partner that can solve all your Cardiology Billing concerns. We improve access management, handle regular claim denials with impeccable turn-around time and expedite cash collections. With a team of experts dedicated to handle all aspects of Revenue Cycle Management, medicalbillersandcoders.com transforms your Cardiology Billing concerns into guaranteed financial success.

How will the Affordable Care Act Impact Cardiology Practitioners and Their RCM?

0 comments
Healthcare industry has been undergoing steady reforms over the past couple of years and the changes are expected to continue. The objective of this ongoing transformation is to achieve improved healthcare services with increased focus on quality care. In such a scenario, Affordable Care Act is being viewed as a promising way of improving healthcare and strengthening financial conditions of the industry. However in addition to expansion of coverage, increased accountability of insurance companies, lowering of healthcare costs and enhancement of quality care for Medicare patients; ACA is expected to increase revenue risk for physicians as well. As a shift from fee-for-service to revenue and cost sharing model of ACOs (Accountable Care Organizations), Cardiology practitioners will face a lot of challenges in realigning their revenue cycles.

Some of the major RCM parameters that ACA will affect practitioners are –
  • Due to bundling efforts, cardiovascular coding will undergo additional changes
  • Medicare fee schedules will change for physicians in addition to the continued threat of reimbursement cuts by 30% due to SGR
  • Penalties for non participation in federal incentive programs like EHR, quality reporting system and e-prescribing
  • Government and commercial insurers will pay for value based services (pay for performance reimbursement model) instead of continuing with the volume based or fee for service model
  • Increased number of Medicare patients to be covered by Cardiology practitioner participating in ACO project, meaning more financial risk and heightened burden on RCM
With rising focus on quality care and expected collaboration between hospitals and independent medical practitioners under ACA, to cut down costs and enhance care coverage, Cardiologists will have to adapt their practices and RCM as per the imminent changes.

RCM or Revenue Cycle Management is the strength of any medical practice aiming to stay financially viable. RCM cannot afford to stagnate in its processes as the healthcare environment is changing on a continual basis. With industry changes, RCM of a Cardiology Practice must transform to better suit the needs of the practice. Given a high likelihood of ACO participation by most Cardiology Practices, some well planned changes in RCM can prepare a practice to absorb heightened risk and derive better revenue from ACO –
  • Compliance to changing regulations and participation in federal programs designed to incentivize practice performance can save your practice a lot of future costs and penalties. Thus RCM of your Cardiology practice must comply with new regulations and keep your practice up to date
  • Change in fee schedules and expected reduced reimbursements by Medicare would mean diminished revenues. Thus focus of your RCM must be to diversify the payers mix to absorb this inevitable decline in revenue
  • Coding and billing changes due to bundling must be tracked and updated in your system to avoid any claim denial or audit complications
  • RCM must strive to adopt value based reimbursement model for your practice and gradually shift away from fee for service payment model
As RCM and billing experts, delivering optimum medical billing and coding services across all 50 US States, medicalbillersandcoders.com can help add value to your revenue model and save you tremendous costs and expenses. Your Cardiology Practice can benefit from our billing and coding experts help and our accurate revenue cycle management can transform a high risk ACO project into a high return venture for you.

Physicians Realign Their Strategies to Meet the Challenges of Healthcare Reform

0 comments
After reforms, the American healthcare industry is seeing a curious change: healthcare providers are adjusting their practice models to suit the needs of Affordable Care Act. A quick look at some of the factors that are provoking these changes will bring about how the changes have not left (or will not leave) any aspect of healthcare operations untouched.

The reforms will completely alter the mode of payment in which healthcare providers are paid by insurance authorities. The mode of payment will go from pay-per-service to per-visit or per service mode. Additionally, the provider will be paid in the form of bundled payments so that there is scope for promoting quality even as costs are driven down.

As far back you can see Medicare’s Physicians’ Quality Reporting System (PQRS) was around as a quality reporting standard which laid down quality parameters for physicians to report on. Albeit, now this reporting is going to become more rigorous: unlike until recently when physicians used to report only on data, now their reports would have to show that they meet each quality metric.

For you more information visit : http://www.medicalbillersandcoders.com



Bundled payment is perhaps the biggest change driver of the reform. Because bundled payments require coordination among various care disciplines involved in providing care, the reform gives the physician’s role prominence over that of the hospital.

As a result of this, surveys have revealed, 70% of hospitals are expanding the number of physicians on their staff to position themselves such that they can handle any initiatives resulting from the reform law. Additionally, bundled payment is also making care providers to either join or set up their own Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs).

Whether it is the mode of payment, the reporting methods, expansion of physician employment in hospitals, the singular area that the changes seem to gravitate towards is insurance reimbursement – how claims are made, medical data gathered to make them, codes (CDT) used, insurance claims paid, etc. And this is not a surprise as the reforms are focused towards bringing down the cost of care; promoting the number of people insured, and improving quality of care.

So equally unsurprising is the fact that the last few months have seen an increase in the number of care providers approaching professional billers and coders to help them sort out their post-reform concerns. However, you would require billing and coding organizations that can combine traditional knowledge with keen awareness of the current changes and how they affect the billing and coding processes and practices.

Following reforms, MBC has helped several healthcare providers to be equipped to face the challenges of reforms either by strengthening their internal operations or by handling their complete billing and coding responsibilities.

MBC’s Revenue Management Consulting services helps providers by assessing their in-house revenue management cycle and ensuring that there is sound coordination between various components of healthcare facilitating smooth flow of medical data for ACO operations and otherwise. We also identify gaps in your process and address them if necessary.

Medicalbillerandcoders.com, the largest consortium of billers and coders in the US, are constantly updating themselves with current healthcare industry trends. In addition serving all 50 US states across varied specialties for more than a decade, MBC experts have the required expertise and experience in Medical Billing and Coding to help clients handle the upcoming reform challenges effectively.

Providers Acquiring Medical Billing Services To Handle the ACA Impact on Revenue

0 comments
The Affordable Care Act has left the healthcare providers in the US worried. A survey conducted sometime back reported that 55% of hospitals expect a dip in their revenue while only 28% think that there would be an increase in revenue. But the survey also revealed that a considerable number of those who are informed about the impact of the healthcare reform (about 58 %) plan to become accountable care organization to reap financial benefit of the reform and improve the quality of care.

The 58 percent that revealed their plan to become ACO organization are well informed about the finer points of The Affordable Care Act as the law aims to set up a national pilot program to encourage care providers of various stripes (doctors, physicians etc) to coordinate and work together to improve quality of care so that they can be reimbursed through a flat fee (bundled payment) for a singular episode of care which the law supposes will lower expense and promote quality of care.

For More Information Visit : http://www.medicalbillersandcoders.com/

However, the concerns of the 55% hospitals that expect a dip in revenue can’t be dismissed either. The insurance authorities propose to pay a flat payment to healthcare providers of different stripes who have come together and formed an ACO. The problem with this model is that it requires sound coordination among the various providers involved in a treatment episode to ensure a centralized collation of medical data which would be used to prepare claims and appropriate codes assigned to them.

Another concern that has worried healthcare providers is that this reform has a punitive nature to it. Millions of tax paying Americans eligible for government-subsidized healthcare coverage but without government-mandated health insurance coverage will be penalized with higher taxes unless they get an insurance policy within a year.

This is indeed good because it will induce more and more Americans to get health insurance bringing them into the net of national healthcare security. Albeit, the problem is this will require healthcare providers to assess insurance eligibility accurately, handle instances of unrealized partial payments where the patient’s bill exceeded his/her coverage, and of course a phenomenal increase in non-medical activities for healthcare providers to handle. Additionally, under ACA insurance providers will provide more coverage for preventive services and these services would have to be coded using separate CPT codes with enrollee-costs waived.
These concerns have sparked a trend where healthcare organizations that were handling their billing and coding responsibilities themselves until now are hiring the services of professional billers and coders. However, it’s important to remember that to handle the above challenges brought by ACA, a billing and coding organization needs to be familiar with the current procedures; be able to handle medical details coming from varied medical practices for preparing claims for bundled payments; be able to negotiate the additional red-tapism in submitting claims; and ensure timely payment of claims through post submission follow-ups.


MBC’s revenue management consulting has been helping physicians by performing a thorough analysis of the Revenue Management Cycle and ensuring that there is sound coordination between various components of healthcare leading to smooth flow of medical data. Our RCM services also involve identifying gaps in the process and addressing them by advising physicians while replacing, if necessary, old software applications with new ones, blocking areas of revenue leakage and identifying areas of staff training.

Medicalbillerandcoders.com, the largest consortium of billers and coders in the US, has also been helping several small to medium size healthcare providers with its Outsourcing services. MBC handles the entire range of activities involved in billing and coding starting from preparation of claims through submission to post-submission follow-ups, along with regularly updating themselves about the changing healthcare industry trends.

Protecting Your Practice Against RAC Audits With the Help of Efficient Medical Billing Practices

0 comments
Efficient medical billing practices can make or break your medical practice and if anything can verify this statement, it is an RAC audit. RAC audits of Recovery Audit Contractor audits are nothing short of a nightmare for any healthcare provider.

Medicare and Medicaid are two healthcare carriers that provide coverage and reimburse physicians and hospitals for the services they provide to patients covered under these carriers. However, medical practitioners are known to receive over-ayments due to incorrect claims or erroneous coding at the time of medical billing. In essence, government tries to ensure patients’ best interest and control the rate of fraud, error or wastage by putting RAC audits in place. But the resultant inconvenience caused to a medical practice in the event of an RAC audit is nothing short of disastrous.

Not only is error-free coding and meticulous book keeping of paramount importance, subsequent adjustment of office accounts can play an important role in case an RAC audit actually happens. To protect your practice against RAC audits, you must put efficient medical billing practices in place –


  • Follow correct coding for services –If a medical service is incorrectly coded for the sake of avoiding internal confusion or due to oversight and the incorrectly coded service is reimbursed by Medicare or Medicaid; then your practice can be in for an RAC audit. Transparent and efficient medical billing practices help you monitor coding of services on a regular basis and avoid simple yet latent disasters, hence with a little more attention, you can save your practice a lot of money and hassle.
  • File claims for correct payment amounts – Scrutinizing the final claim statement filed with healthcare carriers is of paramount importance. If the government settled an incorrect payment amount to your practice, as long as five years ago (as per recent healthcare reforms, the RAC audit period for overpayment has been extended from three years to five years) then your current financials can suffer drastically. Diligent book-keeping is a medical billing practice that can help you avoid this scenario altogether.
  • Avoid duplicate services – It may not be fraud at all, but mention of duplicate services is rarely ever seen as an honest human error by an auditor. A prudent medical billing practice is installing audit software or enlisting the service of a compliance auditor, to fix your errors before an actual audit.
  • Don’t claim for non covered services – Services that are not necessary and reasonable under section 1862(a) (1) (A) of the social security act are not meant to be reimbursed by Medicare or Medicaid. Avoiding inclusion of the same in your claim amount can save you from a potential audit.

Medicalbillersandcoders.com an expert in medical billing and coding serving the healthcare industry for more than decade now can help protect your practice from potential RAC audits by offering immaculate medical billing consultancy and services.

RAC auditors conduct audits on providers in response to insider information or complaints, upon diagnosing irregularities in billing and coding practices as per the CERT or other CMS analysis. With comprehensive and efficient medical billing practices in place with the help of our experienced medical billers and coders, our client’s practices are well equipped with all the required defenses in place to protect themselves against an RAC audit.

Are Medical Practices Moving Forward at the Same Pace as Healthcare Reforms?

0 comments

Healthcare Reforms or Obamacare that had been facing a few political hurdles may have finally broken through all shackles and assumed greater acceleration. While healthcare reforms or Obamacare are largely perceived to pro-patient, physicians or medical practices have no option but to move with the requisite adaption. Amongst a host of reforms, the recommendation of the Affordable Care Act, which seeks to make medical care affordable to every US citizen, may possible be the most demanding adaption ever to have been undertaken by medical practices. This ominous burden plus the pulls of other reforms may have actually impeded their progress, which is currently way short of the expected. In fact, the industry sources believe that medical practices across the US are still struggling with implementation stage of adaptation to healthcare reforms mandates.

What makes these healthcare reforms so daunting is that:

Browse all : Medical Billing


  • Medical practices would find themselves treating more number of Medicare patients than ever before. The extension of Medicare to pre-existing cases as well as dependents under the age of 26 could prove to be exhausting of physicians, who are likely to be disproportionate or short against the patient population. According to a reliable estimate the extension of Obamacare could leave the primary care sector short by 90,000 physicians by 2020!

  • The likelihood of reimbursements being progressively reduced for specialties – contrary to the general feeling of reimbursements improving with patient volume, the proposed Medicare cuts would reduce physicians’ reimbursements by as much as $700 billion. Because the Medicare and states-specific Medicaid account for nearly half of the nation’s health insurance, qualitative appreciation under ACO model of care can only help off-set the Medicare cuts with incentive-based collaborative healthcare delivery.

  • The compulsory implementation of EHR under the HIPAA-5010 mandate, which is likely to disrupt operational flow, consume considerable capital expenditure, as well as train or source staff to conduct EHR systems in the way that best supports patients’ privacy and security norms.

  • There could be considerable change in billing and coding under ICD-10. While ICD-10 may help in streamlining the entire process of reimbursements, physicians will still have to deal with coding-specificity.

  • Fee schedules will get more and more constricted under the new healthcare reforms. While Medicare and Medicaid fees schedules will set the trend of rationalized fee-schedules, it may eventually be followed by the commercial payors as well. Physicians, amidst such dual-impact, may well be forced to optimize their billing efforts to avail maximum reimbursements. And, the process of migrating to a higher system of medical billing may be costly as well as gradual.

  • Under ACO care model, physicians’ reimbursements will happen through bundled fee for services. Therefore, because ACO involves coordinated services among several doctors, there needs to be systematic appropriation of reimbursements based on the involvement of each of the doctors.

While it is true that the face of adapting to the healthcare reforms may have been and likely to be impeded by the reasons highlighted above, they can still be overcome with competent services. Medicalbillersandcoders.com – which offers inclusive Medical Billing Services to a range of medical practitioners across the 50 in the US –promises to help medical practices maneuver through, and adapt effectively and efficiently to the pace of healthcare reforms.

How Radiologists Can Refine Their Revenue Cycle Management (RCM) With Radiology Billing Specialists

0 comments
The emphasis on Revenue Cycle Management could never have been so high as it is now – as radiologists begin to comply with of the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) requirements, they would realize the importance of reinvent their billing and revenue cycle management process to suit the bundled care, shared risk, and quality-driven reimbursement models. With fee-for-service likely to be phased out in favor of value-based service model, radiologists’ revenues may be vulnerable to reductions or long hold-up at the hands of either public plans such as Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial payors. In fact, the population health management requires diagnostic radiologists to adopt shared-risk model with in a period of five years or so. Therefore, radiologists will be under the obligation to coordinate and conform to performance standards for diagnostic services, rendered to both Medicare-supported beneficiaries as well as commercial insurance beneficiaries.

While displaying the requisite level of diagnostic competence may qualify them for value-based reimbursements and incentives, it is no guarantee that they automatically get converted to monetary returns unless they have substantially modified their medical billing and RCM process to the demands of value-based reimbursement model. Notwithstanding radiologists’ internal billing resources, it may not be possible to maneuver through a more regulatory payment environment without an exclusive third party diagnostic radiology Revenue Cycle Management specialist or specialists. The advantage of having such specialists onboard your Radiology Billing and RCM is that they prove catalytic in the entire process of RCM cycle, comprising:

  • Credentialing with inclusion of turnkey services, payer enrollment and contracting, credentialing and verification services, state medical licensing services, and personalized attention for individuals or group radiologists
  • Patient Access with key demographic patient information – including name, social security number, and insurance coverage – to serves as the foundation for payment of services. It is critical that this information be accurate, and linked to other billing functions from centralized registration or pre-registration systems.
  • Accurate and timely charge capture to make sure that all radiology services produce payable claims; it may be remembered that reconciliation of procedures-to-charges will help confirm that an accurate number of claims have been generated.
  • Coding powered by automatic and electronic coding of ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes, supervised by trained coders that specialize in CPT, ER and E&M coding
  • Billing, complete with electronic claim submission, posting denials and aggressive follow up of delays and denials
  • Collection with emphasis on conversion of older account receivables first and within the permissible time limit.


As radiologists seek to uplift their revenue fortunes with Radiology Billing Specialists, Medicablbillersandcoders.com offers to mediate the employment of radiology billing specialists, who are capable of:
  • Keeping reimbursements as per negotiated fee schedules with Medicare, Medicaid, or commercial health insurance carriers
  • Guaranteeing payment contracts as per prevailing market
  • Minimizing A/R days through complete and timely charge capture
  • Enhancing payment accuracy with line-item posting of charges and payments
  • Averting risk through the industry’s most comprehensive compliance program

Efficient Billing Practice to Aid Physicians amidst Continual Coding Revisions, and Avert the Possibility of Denials

0 comments
Amongst the possible reasons for denials, coding inadequacies seem to have a major impact. Because codes quantify and qualify physicians’ medical services for medical reimbursements from payers, any inherent coding error, miscoding, over or under-coding can lead to denials upon found to be incongruent with acceptable coding practices. While a few coding manipulations may happen intentionally, most of the time it is the complexities of coding that often expose physicians or their staff to coding errors. With revisions made to CPT and HCPCS Level II codes every year, coding-related complexities are destined to multiply further. Failure to discern and apply revised coding systems may eventually result in disqualification or outright Denial of Physicians’ claims. As a result, physicians may have to forgo a considerable chunk of their revenues in the absence of remedial measures.

Even as most of the physicians have some form of in-house medical billing that addresses coding demands, the growing coding revisions and complexities require much more than simple form of in-house medical coding. It really takes an efficient medical billing management to monitor and resolve coding errors and denials. The value of such efficient medical billing management is that it can:

  • Renew your encounter forms or super bills and systems (where codes are stored and used for claim submission) as and when coding changes are announced.
  • Update physicians’ internal clinical documentation in a way that best suffices the demands of evolving coding revisions or changes.
  • Apply revised CPT coding guidelines to validate and minimize the risk of denials. It is noteworthy that such instant adherence to coding guidelines will naturally be appreciated by payers, which may be reflected in fewer audits and denials.
  • Bargain for better fee schedules based on revised reimbursement rates for the new and revised codes.
  • Help understand and respond to payers’ payment policies towards revised codes, establishing medical necessity of a medical service, and clinical reporting.
  • Employ National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits while resolve the bundling of codes.


Parallel to these comprehensive medical billing management initiatives, it could also monitor and resolve denials through:
  • Payer-specific report generation of denials using Review practice management system (PMS).
  • Discover the main reason behind denials, and resubmit claims with requisite modification and correction to codes.
  • Supporting the applied codes with solid proof of medical necessity of medical services

As physicians across the U.S. seek to adapt to evolving coding revisions – of which ICD-10 alone will have 70,000 odd PCS codes, it may seem difficult without experts’ intervention.

Medicalbillersandcoders.com has effectively positioned to play the role of a facilitator during this phase of coding transformation. Our affiliation with medical billing specialists – competent and experienced to bring about systematic elevation in physicians’ coding practices – should help physicians respond to the challenges of continual coding revisions, and mitigate the possibility of denials as far as possible.

Responding To Growth-Induced Orthopedic Medical Billing Needs with Specialist Intervention

1 comments
Orthopedics have been on upward growth trajectory thanks to a host of conducive factors – continued pro-orthopedic Medicare reimbursement reforms, innovative care procedures, breakthroughs in orthopedic technology and anesthesia administration have largely been responsible for upsurge in practice volumes. The combination of these factors has enabled shifting orthopedic from hospital-based inpatient form to a more popular and affordable form – outpatient or ambulatory settings. It is noteworthy that this form of orthopedic care is currently growing at over 20%, which is comparable with other fastest growing specialties.

While orthopedic practitioners have reasons to be upbeat about their practice prospects, they should equally be cautious and prepared for billing complexities that may be accompanying the swelling practice volumes.
-->
One of the primary reasons why Orthopedic Billing may be susceptible to billing complexities is that orthopedic comprises a broad spectrum of procedures to treat a variety of orthopedic conditions, which are perceived and valued differently by payers. Therefore, it would require orthopedic practitioners to be versatile to respond with orthopedic billing and coding in conformity with individual perception of the payer who they are submitting their claim to. More than mere submission of claims, they should necessarily have a systematic Revenue Cycle Management with comprehensive processes such as coding, charge posting, claims filing, payment posting, A/R follow-up including denial management, and reporting.

Significantly, insurance underpayments, which are more rampant in orthopedic and as high as 10 to 15% of the actual claims, may push orthopedic practices into a state of revenue erosion that could jeopardize their clinical and operational efficiency. As a result, they might have to emphasize on monitoring and minimizing underpayments with an effective process of credentialing, verification, patient eligibility, and proper coding & billing.


Coding revisions too would substantially add up to Orthopedic Billing woes – with the on-set ICD-10, orthopedic codes will be more complex, detailed, and numerically too many to code a wide array of orthopedic procedures such as bone graft, open surgical partial removal of collar bone, partial repair or removal of shoulder bone, open repair of rotator cuff, open repair of rotator cuff, reconstruction rotator cuff, open repair elbow fracture involving ulnar bone, wrist fracture pinning through skin, open surgical treatment wrist fracture, shoulder scope, repair cartilage tear, shoulder scope, partial removal collar bone, shoulder scope, bone shaving, shoulder scope, rotator cuff repair, injection of lower back joint, and many more. This monumental coding revision might warrant appointment of specialist coding professionals.

The changing orthopedic coding and billing landscape would require, among various other things,

  • To evaluate where you stand currently as against the projected requirements for a comprehensive orthopedic RCM comprising coding, charge posting, claims filing, payment posting, A/R follow-up including denial management, and reporting.
  • To earmark resources to monitor finances, and assigning them the responsibility of meeting with patients before admission to pre-collect copays, deductibles and co-insurance amounts, and work out payment plans as needed.
  • To improve front-end revenue cycle management, comprising checking coverage and verifying patient information before hand.
  • To facilitate training coders on coding revisions as and when they happen.

As in the case of most busy and critical medical disciplines, orthopedics may also be bound by an overriding clinical focus that may be limiting their exposure to full-pledged orthopedic medical billing reforms. Medicalbillersandcoders.com – having successfully mediated resource-deployment for growth-induced medical billing requirements across the broad spectrum of medical disciplines – offers to replicate it in orthopedics too. With an affiliation with chosen pool of orthopedic medical billing specialists across the 50 states in the U.S., orthopedics can expect to have instant access to specialist medical billing services.

Orthopedic Billing Specialist to Take Care of CPT Code Changes Made to Orthopedic Surgery Billing in 2013

1 comments
This year’s CPT Manual has spelt out extensive coding changes and revisions to orthopedic surgical codes.  In all, there are 500 code changes to the Category I codes, including 251 revisions, 151 new codes and 100 deletions. Moreover, there has been significant overhauling of nerve conduction studies, some revisions to the radiology section, and E/M changes. The extent of these coding changes and revisions, having already taken effect from January 1, 2013, has begun to impact orthopedic reimbursements in a big way. As a result, orthopedic practices may have inherited an ominous task of migrating to   a higher order in orthopedic surgical coding. Given the CPT Manual’s full list of revisions, deletions, and additions to have been effected for 2013, orthopedic practices would require to be conversant with the guidelines for the following coding sections:

  • Spine CPT Errata, whereinchange has been added to the spine bone grafts (20930–20938), instrumentation (22840–22844, 22848, 22845–22847), and intervertebral device (22851) CPT codes.
  • Bone marrow aspirate, wherein explanation has been added to bone graft codes (20930–20938) related to bone marrow aspiration. Henceforth, Category III code 0232T should be used when bone marrow aspiration is performed for platelet-rich stem cell.
  • Cervical Spinal Arthrodesis, which is now required to be coded as per the new guidelines issued to CPT codes 22554, 22585, 63075, and 63076
  • Cast application, which now includesguideline changes made to “Application and Strapping” section addressing the application of the first cast, its removal, coding by the individual who performs the initial service, and restorative management.
  • Hip arthroscopy, under whichCPT code 29916 (Arthroscopic labral repair of a torn labrum) is now considered inherent to CPT codes 29915, 29862, and 29863.
  • Chemodenervation, in which a new guideline change is introduced for CPT code 64614 used in  Chemodenervation of muscle(s); extremity and/or trunk muscle(s)
  • Intraoperative nerve monitoring is now included in the primary surgical service and is not separately reportable.
  • New CPT codes applicable to procedures for spine, shoulder arthroplasty, elbow arthroplasty, nerve conduction, extracorporeal shock wave: wound healing, etc.

Borwse All : Medical billing blog

While these are some of the notable changes and guidelines to have been effected for orthopedic surgical coding since the beginning of 2013, orthopedic practices may need to follow these action steps to be fully compliant with the changes and revisions:
  • Analyze the 2013 CPT Manual in its entirety to understand the guideline changes found throughout it. Specifically focus on the E&M changes and new codes that may have applicability to your practice.

  • Revise charge capture tools, electronic health record (EHR) lists and short lists or favorites, if charge capture is performed within the EHR.

  • Enroll with an accredited orthopedic surgical coding course.
Medicalbillersandcoders.com – which has always stood by the physician community during times of medical billing and coding crisis – has arranged for networking with the right resources (orthopedic coding specialists) to maneuver through this major surgical orthopedic coding changes and revisions. The competence and experience of our select pool of surgical Orthopedic Billing specialists should help you minimize the impact of this coding change and revision while ensuring appreciable increase in orthopedic reimbursements.

Negotiating Your Reimbursement Rates during this Phase of Payer Consolidation & Health Insurer Monopoly Power

0 comments
Physicians’ choice of health plans and contracts seem to be getting fewer and fewer with each passing moment as U.S. health insurance sector, particularly the private sector, witnesses unprecedented payer consolidation, acquisitions, and mergers amongst private health insurance carriers. Besides contradicting the hope that such consolidation, acquisitions, and mergers would bring down the cost premiums for patients, it has virtually helped a few players to wield monopoly over the entire commercial health insurance landscape. The situation has grown so unchecked 70 percent of 385 metropolitan areas in the U.S. do not have competitive conditions, and as much as 40 percent of these areas have a single health insurer controlling the majority share of the commercial health insurance market. As a result, physicians have virtually lost the bargaining leverage that they would have enforced had there been a perfect competitive market for commercial plans.

Physicians only source of revenue is from reimbursements from services they offer to patients, who may be supported commercial health insurance plans or public programs, such as Medicaid and Medicare. With most of the commercial health insurance market moving toward monopoly, physicians, mostly those practicing in small groups, are finding it difficult to negotiate adequate reimbursements. As a result, those insurers with monopoly powers are dictating the payment rates, which are often below the acceptable scale. Such unilateral administration of payments could leave physicians struggling to meet their financial obligations, obligations, including payroll, and to invest in and sustain desirable quality of medical care to their patients.

Browse All : Medical Billing Blog

Even the thought of accepting public insurance plans may not prove to be all that profitable – most of the patients may not have the resources to pay for out-of-pocket expenses well above the rates borne public programs, such as Medicare and Medicaid, whose rates are deemed insufficient to cover for a decent quality of medical cost. Thus, small physicians are often left with no choice but to accept rates dictated by dominant commercial insurers.

While the physicians associations have voiced strong protest against health insurer consolidations, in particular, mergers between two health insurers which threaten to create a single insurer with absolute power, it may take a while to disintegrate the trend towards a competitive market that can bring back bargaining power to physicians and patients alike. Till such time, physicians may well have to be content with rates as fixed their commercial payer. Alternatively, they can entrust their Medical Billing processes to an external entity that can use its competence and experience to arrive at as profitable a rate as possible. 

Medicalbillersandcoders.com – which has been a preferred platform for comprehensive medical billing resources – can help physicians impacted with the trend of commercial insurance consolidation. Our nation-wide affiliation with chosen pool of medical billing experts helps us to deploy resources that enhance medical billing efficiency, reduce the possibility of delay, denials, and improve practice revenues. Their expertise and experience could easily be extended for negotiating as best a reimbursement rate as possible even at this juncture of commercial payer monopoly.

How best are medical practices prepared to address HIPAA breaches?

0 comments
Contrary to the notion that government’s move to digitize healthcare information would enable healthcare providers, doctors, and insurance companies comply more aptly with HIPAA’s guidelines for patients’ privacy and security, there has been an upsurge in HIPAA breaches with providers being reported for breaches of some kind or the other. Electronic Health Record (EHR) systems, which are made mandatory for providers seeking to attain ‘Meaningful Use’ status, have shown propensity to be manipulated either internally or by unscrupulous external elements. Either way, providers have been held accountable and penalized for breach of HIPAA’s mandate for ensuring patients’ information safety and security. With the cost data breaches being unbearable and providers or doctors’ credibility at stake, it is inevitable that HIPAA breaches are responded instantly with remedial measures, such as:
  • Replacing or removing the staff that may have committed the violation at a particular EHR access point. If the HIPAA breach is traced to an external attack, EHR access may need to be secured against all possible external threats such as hacks or thefts by manipulating EHR system passwords.

  • Parallel recommendation to improve the HIPAA program; an intrinsic part of such improvement program would necessarily mean reframing EHR policy and staff training or reorientation in accordance with changing EHR environment.

  • Apprising your EHR vendors of the need for better customizing the EHR systems so that you may possibly withstand any kind of threats to patients’ health data.

  • Establishing protocols for tasks, timelines and communication among the team to ensure everything on your EHR system runs as smoothly as possible.

  • Accurate and thorough assessment of the potential risks and vulnerabilities to the confidentiality, integrity and availability of electronic protected health information (EPHI).Irrespective of the compliance requirements, it is important that scope of the assessment is clearly defined, and communicated across the staff entrusted with the responsibility of conducting healthcare data in accordance with ‘Meaningful Use’ criterion under HIPAA.

  • Determining how personal health information (PHI) and electronic personal health information (EPHI) are received, stored, transmitted, accessed or disclosed.

  • Documenting HHS, which will require the analysis in writing, including material gathered and the corrective actions took to remediate problems uncovered by the assessment. The significance of such reports is that they act reference as well as proof during audits or verification by authorities.

  • Conducting periodic risk assessments to mitigate the possibility of a potential data breach.
Browse all : Medical Billing Blog
 
While providers or doctors may have some form mechanism to respond any case of healthcare data breach or violation, it may not always possible for everyone to have comprehensive set of measures, working to put their EHR systems compliant with HIPAA audits. Therefore, they may have to seek external help to keep eternal vigil on their data systems.

And, when it is the question of sourcing resources for such an array of data-related tasks, Medicalbillersandcoders.com offers to mediate for the deployment of best resources that have demonstrated expertise and experience in implementing secure and HIPAA compliant healthcare data management systems and processes.

What Do Stage 2 Meaningful Use Guidelines Have in Store for Radiologists?

0 comments
Stage 2 meaningful use guidelines are finally out, and radiologists may heave a sigh of relief since most of the ambiguity that existed in Stage 1 about their eligibility and the ways to approach the qualification criterion seem to have been made amply clear by CMS and the Office of the National Coordinator (ONC). The American College of Radiology (ACR) needs word praise for its relentless effort in getting most of the necessary changes made to radiology guidelines before the Stage 2 meaningful compliance regime comes into force.  While it is not before 2014 that radiologists should complying with newly laid out guidelines, it may still require some crucial adjustments in processes and technology to be fully ready for compliance and qualification under State 2 of meaningful use criterion.

Even as the Stage 2 requirements offer clarity for how computerized physician order entry (CPOE) will impact radiology, providers would still be required to use CPOE to order more than 30 percent — instead of the 60 percent CMS originally proposed — of radiology procedures during an EHR reporting period in order to qualify for MU incentive payments. Therefore, the necessity of having an efficient and effective computerized physician order entry (CPOE) would still be there.

As regards the problem of complying with the MU requirements on account of rarity of face-to-face contact with patients, radiologists and other providers may get reprieve from noncompliance penalties, but still they would be required to be versatile with specialty codes use in the Provider Enrollment Chain and Ownership System (PECOS). And this proficiency in using the Provider Enrollment Chain and Ownership System (PECOS) would definitely require specialized training or they might have to appoint external coding specialists for the purpose.


While Stage 2 rules do not require an EHR to store images, providers or radiologist would still be required to ensure that they an active link to the images. Despite the initially proposed linkage of 40% being brought down to 10% finally, it would still be quite a task to keep those 10% active as and when required for clinical study, interpretation, or sought by patients for various documentation needs.

Along with these inherent challenges, providers or radiologists may still have to sort out the issue with employing clinical decision support (CDS) as The Stage 2 rules to do not expand the definition of CPOE to include computerized decision support (CDS). Also, there may be issues with transporting images in the absence of clear cut rules even in Stage 2. While DICOM mode can be relied upon for secure encoding images,   IHE profiles, such as XDS-I and XDR-I would still have to be sent via secure email, which may sometimes be vulnerable to security and privacy threats. Therefore, it could require a dedicated monitoring to see that such files are not exposed to threats.

Amidst managing as critical a practice as radiology, complying with these set of Stage 2 guidelines for meaningful use might either be too demanding or detrimental to the very purpose of diagnostic or imaging excellence.  Medicalbillersandcoders.com – with an objective to ensure diagnostic or imaging excellence unaffected by Stage 2 demands – has offered to mediate the deployment of Radiology Billing specialists that have the requisite competence and experience to implement processes and technology on behalf of radiologists, seeking to comply with the Stage 2 guidelines, and qualify for incentives.

Medicare Fraud Claims, A New Challenge Even For Honest US Physicians – is Competent Billing and Coding A Way Out?

0 comments
In 2010, Medicare improper payment amounted to $47.9 billion. Human and Health Services, in 2011, recovered $4.1 billion paid through reimbursements as a result of ‘fraudulent’ or ‘improper’ claims. You may be right if you think you won’t ever be among the fraudulent care practitioners who contributed to these figures because you are scrupulous.

But being scrupulous can’t prevent you from being suspected by federal authorities, thanks to the profusion of fraudulent cases – because bizarrely all some care providers have had to do to attract the scrutiny of federal authorities is over use a billing code, regardless of whether they did it for right or wrong reasons.

Why guard against Medicare fraud claims?

What federal authorities track is which codes are being used the most in terms of charges and unit volume at a national level. And then monitors the use of these codes by care practitioners. Currently E&M codes, for instance, have been found to be high in terms of charges and unit volume at a national level and are expected to be a potential target. It means merely using E&M codes can actually expose physician centers to scrutiny by Medicare authorities.

However, to negotiate this situation, you have to understand why it’s happening. And to understand this phenomenon, let us use E&M codes as an example to see how they actually can become subjects of potential abuse. (Remember, it could be any codes; E&M has just been used as an example here.) E&M services are ones provided by physicians and non-physician practitioners to assess patients and manage their care – and the code to get reimbursement is chosen based on the location where the service is performed, medical history, examination and medical decision making.

Browse all : Medical Billing Blog

As is evident, while some of the bases of choosing E&M codes are objective and straightforward, others are subjective in nature and dependent on availability of information (medical decision making, medical history etc) to the coder who is making the choice. This leaves a scope for human error (both deliberate and otherwise) and misjudgment.

The problems physician practices face today are in the subjective areas. Their in-house billers and coders mostly contend with ineffective in-house coordination between billing and coding and medical processes leading to inadequate medical information based on which coding judgments are made. Even if medical information is available, billers and coders are sometimes beset by lack of sound-enough familiarity with complex medical procedures where diagnoses may often overlap making it difficult to decipher where one ends and another starts leading to wrong assignment of codes and overbilling through coding of diagnoses not covered by Medicare.

With most physician centers the concern is not intended fraud but misinformation and inaccuracy in coding construed as fraud by Medicare or over coding a code under surveillance without documents and details to support it.

Guarding your practice...

You can guard yourself against eventualities stemming from this by tightening up your revenue management system so that there is adequate coordination between various processes ensuring a seamless flow of information and then conducting periodic internal audits by certified coders who will randomly pull up billing and coding documentation of recent patients to check their accuracy.

A clean in-house process or billing and coding handled by experienced billers and coders is the best way to avoid fraudulence and wrong data leading to financial penalties and resulting and attendant consequences.
MBC has helped several big and small care providers to spruce up their revenue management system through its Revenue Management Consulting services. We perform a thorough analysis of your revenue management cycle and lubricate various points of interaction it has with other areas of operation ensuring smooth flow of data. This involves identifying gaps in your process and addressing them by replacing, if necessary, old software applications with new ones, blocking areas of revenue leakage and identifying areas of staff training.  

Medicalbillerandcoders.com, the largest consortium of billers and coders in the US, who are experienced, certified and updated regularly, has helped medical practices improve their finances due to accurate electronic billing, intricate procedure coding, electronic filing of claims and a multi-layered application process - collectively resulting in reduced claim denials and enhanced core-business focus.

Protect Your Medical Practice in Uncertain Times with a Medical Billing Specialist

0 comments

The healthcare reforms brought by the Obama administration have in many ways been an industry-churning affair. They have changed the number of patients the healthcare centers receive today, affected the administrative activities that revolve around a typical treatment episode, shifted the professional location of several medical practitioners (independent physicians aligning with hospitals) etc.

These changes have caused severe hurt to small healthcare centers and left the big ones financially ruffled, leaving organizations ill-equipped to meet their future goals leaving them far behind organizational aspirations.  

If we look at the changes triggered by reforms as separate facts without any connecting link between them, the situation will look irretrievable. But if we look a little closer to find out that link which unites them, what will spring to our attention is the fact that all of them have a revenue impact on a healthcare organization.

For example, a healthcare organization receiving more patients stems from the fact that the reforms have widened the healthcare security net to include more people than before. It is commendable but more patients may lead to more rejection of reimbursement claims if their insurance eligibility and extent of insurance coverage are not properly checked and proper codes not assigned while preparing their claims, not to mention the fact that more volume causes oversight of minor details.

The second example pertains to administrative responsibilities. While administrative responsibilities were always part of a treatment episode, they have become a concern today as the new changes brought by reforms need a greater collaboration among medical and nonmedical (billing and coding) sections of a healthcare organization to ensure a steady flow of medical information between them based on which decisions will be made. A point in case is the Medicare frauds coming to light in case of E&M coding where the choice of appropriate codes is done by the coder based on medical inputs he/she receives. 

Browse All : Medical Billing Blog

There is also a need to understand the medical information (about procedures and diagnoses) passed on to billers and coders accurately so that proper coding choices can be made preventing making under-claims and over-claims, especially the latter as it can lead to security by Medicare authorities, now overly sensitized by rising insurance frauds. Similarly, there are other operational challenges brought in by reforms.

Independent physicians aligning with hospital is not a very old phenomenon and one that had been sparked by healthcare reforms – because, to transfer cost benefit to the patient, reimbursement requires services to be bundled up, which has forced hospitals to align with independent physicians to offer varied medical services under one roof, begetting a new set of problems for in-house billing and coding and administrative teams to contend with.

And the impacts of these challenges accumulated over a period of time starts showing on the financial performance of a healthcare organization leading to a situation where yearly financial targets missed by small margins each year adds up to form a big lag after the lapse of a passage of time, sapping vigor and life out of the organization. 

Medicalbillersandcoders.com the largest billing and coding consortium in the US has helped both small and big healthcare centers to avoid this scenario by offering billing and coding service modules that are flexible and can be adjusted to fit the billing and coding needs of any healthcare organization regardless of size.

If you are a large medical outfit with an in-house team of billers and coders to handle claims, as part of our Revenue Management Consulting services, we can prune up your revenue management system by advising you about software applications suiting your purpose and environment, sprucing up your lengthy processes or replacing them with new ones if required and training people in new billing and coding techniques and methodologies.

However, if you neither have an in-house team of billers and coders nor any reason to have one, you can outsource your entire billing and coding process to us and nullify your claim rejection rates and boost your revenues.

Demand for Gastroenterology Services to Impact Medical Billing in Clinics and Hospitals?

0 comments

The consistent rise in demand for Gastroenterology services has really been a boon for clinics and hospitals. But the growth has been so overwhelming that it started affecting their reimbursements in a big way. While practitioners have generally been preoccupied with clinical duties, their medical billing staff have found the voluminous growth simply hard to cope with. As a result, there may been considerable delay in processing claims, leaving physicians’ bills to pile up as ‘account receivables’. The situation is likely to be even more demanding as a large percentage of population is going to be brought under Medicare and other insurance schemes. As per the reliable industry sources, Gastroenterology specialty alone will see 20 to 25 percent growth over the next five years or so.

Fortunately, Gastroenterology practices can replace or ease medical billing woes with outsourced Gastroenterology medical billing solutions. The quality of services offered is generally good across the US, but it is still advisable to gauge your prospective service providers’ credentials before taking them onboard. Amongst many parameters against which you may judge your prospective Gastroenterology Billing partners’ competence, following assume more significance than the rest:

  • History of your prospective Gastroenterology billing partners:
    It is always safe and prudent to engage with billing partners with considerable and demonstrated ability to handle medical claims with Medicare, Medicaid and commercial carriers.
  • Staff’s experience and credentials: It is the billing professionals’ experience and credentials that translate into tangible benefits for you. Thus, it is important to verify your prospective billing company’s staff’s experience and credentials such as being certified billers and coders from authorized institutes.
  • Timeliness and accuracy of service: Notwithstanding your Gastroenterology billing company’s credentials, it all the more important that they deliver on-time and accurate billing services.
  • Being compliant with Federal as well as state-specific Gastroenterology regulatory compliance: Outsourced billing service providers are bound by the regulatory compliance standards, either Federal or state-specific. As outsourced service providers, it is imperative that your prospective Gastroenterology billing partners comply with either of the two
  • Competitive cost: With other things being equal, you should insist on those partners whose prices are relatively less.
  • Inclusiveness of services: While you may be availing Gastroenterology billing solutions, yet your billing partners should be judged for their ability to offer inclusive set of services, such as the entire process of Gastroenterology Revenue Cycle Management (RCM).


The advantage of this fact-checking is that it you can be sure of the following benefits from your billing partners:

  • Timely Processing and Submission of Claims: Once you have chosen Gastroenterology billing company against the parameters listed above, it is more or less guaranteed that your claims will be processed and submitted in time either through paper or electronically. The timeliness and accuracy of submission will go a long way in fast realization of your Gastroenterology claims with Medicare or commercial carriers.
  • Follow up with payors: Follow up, being an integral component of your billing providers’ services, will help isolate partially paid or unpaid claims and entitle you to the amount due to you.
  • Report Generation: The utility of having an inclusive Gastroenterology billing service partner is that you can expect to be fed with reports that can be used to bring about clinical and operational improvement.

As you begin your search for inclusive Gastroenterology Billing service providers, you may find the selection a bit tricky. That is precisely why we, at Medicalbillersandcoders.com, are committed to mediate the deployment of Gastroenterology billing resources chosen from a talent-pool of Gastroenterology billers across the 50 states in the U.S.

Spiraling Cost of Gastroenterology Services to Warrant Billing Partner!

1 comments
Despite Gastroenterology being one of the high-yielding practices, practitioners’ revenues from reimbursements continue to remain below par. This can be a distressing trend considering the spiraling cost of administering gastroenterology services. While clinical and technological advancements have brought in unimaginable precision to care, billing requirements too have become more demanding than ever before. As a result, a considerable portion of gastroenterology bills are susceptible to delays and denials, most of which are never pursued owing to incompetent billing practices. With the combined cost of such unrealized claims amounting to almost 20% of the total bills submitted, gastroenterology practices would do well to find better billing alternatives. While internal billing resources may be brought up with training and orientation, its success rate has not been all that impressive. Moreover, it could prove costly.

In view of the uncertainty over internal billing capabilities, hiring or outsourcing the entire gastroenterology billing management could prove to be a wise decision.  While the quality of outsourced gastroenterology generally happens to be good, you may still have to assess your prospective billing partners’ competence and experience against your requirements and the prevailing gastroenterology billing complexities. Primarily, your gastroenterology billing partner needs to be proficient in:
  • Complex gastroenterology billing codes and rules
  • Gastroenterology-related terminology
  • Office notes and operative notes, coding for surgical procedures
  • Code variations related to multiple procedure rules
  • Denial process and appeal denied claims quickly and efficiently to ensure speedy reimbursement
The advantage of evaluating your prospective Gastroenterology Billing partner against these requirements is that it make you believe that you will be assured of comprehensive billing, collections, and practice management services, interspersed with:
  • Account receivables management
  • Round-the-clock claims processing
  • Checking system based eligibility
  • Quarterly coding updates
  • System-based claims scrubbing
  • Comprehensive response to all billing calls
  • Regular quality assurance checks
  • Weekly meetings to discuss progress and go over reports
  • Customized monthly reports
Browse all : Medical Billing Blog
Such proven gastroenterology billing practices would invariably facilitate:
  • Improved collections and income
  • Accelerated payments and reduced stress
  • 24/7 accessibility to your patient data and financial information
  • Transparency throughout the revenue cycle
  • Full financial and practice management reporting
Even as you scout for your prospective gastroenterology billing partner, Medicalbillersandcoders.com – with impeccable success in deploying apt gastroenterology billing specialists for practices across the 50 states in the US – offers a chosen pool of gastroenterology billers, adept at coding, billing, payer relations, patient relations, collections, financial reporting, fee analysis, managed-care contracts.

Would Dwindling Medicare and Medicaid Payment Rates Turn Providers to Private Insurance Beneficiaries?

0 comments
It is an irony that Medicare and Medicaid, which reimburse more than the half of the nation’s total health insurance, have come in for heavy flak by physicians, who claim to have lost considerable revenues that they could otherwise have rightfully earned had they avoided seeing Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries and favored patients with private health insurance policies. The problem seems to originate from the sustainable growth rate (SGR) formula that has been proved unscientific against exponential growth in public health care beneficiaries and medical cost associated. Thus, physicians have constantly been put to Medicare and Medicaid cuts. And with Affordable Care Act recommending inclusion of millions of uninsured and baby boomers into the fold, physicians may get highly selective in admitting Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries in an effort to save themselves from being affected with rather discouraging payments rates.

As a matter of fact these two popular government health schemes have been woefully behind payment rates offered by private insurance carriers. As a result, there has considerable shift in insurance pattern, which has resulted in escalation of the private health insurance cost by as much as 25 to 30 percent during the last 5 years. While private insurance beneficiaries have been fetching providers appreciably revenues well over their operational costs, Medicare and Medicaid have seemingly been returning revenues well below the operational costs. To be precise, doctor or hospital receives 10% less in Medicare and Medicaid umbrella as against 20% more on every dollar spent as clinical and operational cost on patients. What is even more worrying is that physicians have consistently been undergoing Medicare cuts, which now threatens to erode physicians’ revenues by as much as 25%.

Browse all : Medical Billing blog

If Medicare reimbursements are staring at a monumental cut of 25%, Medicaid reimbursements too have not been that impressive either. Medicaid reimbursements have historically been varying from state to state. Moreover, Medicaid has traditionally been paying much less than Medicare. Although efforts are on to keep Medicaid reimbursements on par with Medicare’s, the expected inclusion of 15 million into Medicaid fold may not eventual allow it happen.

While the inclusion of 77 million baby boomers into the public insurance ambit may provide voluminous clinical opportunities to doctors, the proposed cut to Medicare spending by as much as $426 billion over the next decade could drastically spoil their revenue prospects. With reimbursements revenues expected to decrease even further, physicians or hospitals may not be inclined to seeing more of Medicare and Medicaid beneficiaries. Thus, they may have to substitute their portfolio with more and more private health insurance beneficiaries. While patients with private health insurance policies may be more lucrative, there would always be the risk of dealing with private insurance carriers, who are seemingly more vigilant and stricter when it comes to reimbursements. Given the challenges of private insurance reimbursement environment, it may require an external medical billing mediation to orchestrate the entire process of billing, submitting and realizing the claims to their fullest.

Medicalbillersandcoders.com has considerable experience in deploying medical billing resources as demanded by unique operational challenges. As providers shift their preference towards private health insurance beneficiaries, our nation-wide affiliation with medical billing specialists that are versatile enough to deal with heterogeneous payers should offer them the requisite leverage to manage their medical billing process as efficiently as possible.

What Implication Will Reimbursement Cuts For 2013 Have on Radiology Collections?

0 comments
Radiology collections, which have been far from being impressive in the recent years, may further go down amidst a host of issues likely to surface throughout 2013. Significant of those issues is the reimbursement cuts, which is supposed to lead to a reduction of almost 19% in the collections of radiology practices. Further, a 25% cut in payments for imaging services has not gone down well with providers, who may eventually be discouraged to comply and continue with revised guidelines.

Closely on the heels of this monumental cut in reimbursements, radiologists seem to be overwhelmed by the demands of Meaningful Use (MU) requirements. While the stage 2 of ‘meaningful use’ promises to be lot easier to comply by, it is highly impossible to predict whole-hearted participation – as much as 40% of radiologists are reported to have stayed from the MU bandwagon, citing reasons such as lack clarity in the program and seemingly unbearable costs associated with it. Therefore, we might as well see radiologists losing collections on account being non-compliant with MU requirements. While the absence of mandatory penalties might seem to be reason for their reluctance, other priority tasks too may have limited their financial and entrepreneurial abilities.

Other than these compliance, lowered payments and Radiology Billing issues, the core clinical issues often seem to consume most of radiologists’ time and resources. As a result, despite the heavy investments, they may continue to have reduced radiology collections. Therefore, it is important that radiologists have or source the expertise to balance clinical as well business side of their practices. The utility of having such expertise is that radiologists will be able to:
  • Successfully adapt to meaningful use guidelines

  • Better appreciate changing regulations

  • Manage radiology collections better despite the reimbursement cuts, and

  • Qualify for financial incentives under Meaningful Use criterion and PQRS reporting standards
If the expertise is hard to come by internally, Radiology Billing Outsourcing may possible have answers to every clinical and operational issue, and save radiology practices going into further clinical and financial crisis. The significant advantage of outsourcing is that they come at a price far less than what they would cost if carried out internally. Moreover, it gives ample scope for concentrating on more important aspect – evolving with clinical standards for diagnostic and imaging services. With financial incentive schemes not likely to be stretched beyond 2016, time may be running out for radiologists who have not preparation as yet.

And, those radiology practices that are willing try out Outsourced Radiology Billing Practices to offset the implication of reform measures, Medicalbillersandcoders.com offers the right platform to source radiology billing services from chosen pool of radiology billing specialists. With an in-depth expertise and substantial experience in mediating change-over and adaptation to clinical and operational reforms, these experts may well be crucial in keeping your radiology collections as healthy as possible.
*